| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
09/04/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/04/2018 |
|
Autor : |
BUFFA, J.I.; CANAN, G.; VARALLA, D. |
|
Título : |
Evaluación del impacto de la inclusión de la forestación en los sistemas ganaderos. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Integración Ganadería Forestación, 2017, no. 1, p. 81-87. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
Tabla de contenido de la Revista: Página. 1. Prólogo: C. Mantero; V. Morales; Página 3: Estado actual de la investigación en sistemas silvopastoriles en Uruguay: C. Viñoles, J.K. Fedrigo, V. Benítez, R. Santa Cruz, J.P. Posse; Página 24. Aportes de INIA a la construcción de sistemas de producción integrados: J.M. Soares de Lima, R. Scoz; Página 35: Contribución de áreas forestales en el balance de gases de efecto invernadero de sistemas ganaderos extensivos en Uruguay: G. Becoña; Página 42. Selecao, manejo e produtividade do componente forrageiro em sistemas silvipastoris; Página 52. Integracao pastagem nativa-cultivos arbóreos; Página 63. Microclima en sistemas silvopastoriles: C. Munka; Página 69. Coeficientes técnicos para cuantificar el potencial de la integración forestación-ganadería, ¿Qué datos tenemos para presupuestar una ganadería entre los montes?: A. Simeone, V. Beretta, C.J. Caorsi; Página 81. Evaluación del impacto de la inclusión de la forestación en los sistemas ganaderos: J.I. Buffa, G. Canan, D. Varalla. |
|
Palabras claves : |
IMPACTO. |
|
Thesagro : |
FORESTACIÓN; GANADERÍA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/9102/1/Impacto-forestacion-en-ganaderia.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01591naa a2200181 a 4500
001 1058412
005 2018-04-09
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBUFFA, J.I.
245 $aEvaluación del impacto de la inclusión de la forestación en los sistemas ganaderos.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aTabla de contenido de la Revista: Página. 1. Prólogo: C. Mantero; V. Morales; Página 3: Estado actual de la investigación en sistemas silvopastoriles en Uruguay: C. Viñoles, J.K. Fedrigo, V. Benítez, R. Santa Cruz, J.P. Posse; Página 24. Aportes de INIA a la construcción de sistemas de producción integrados: J.M. Soares de Lima, R. Scoz; Página 35: Contribución de áreas forestales en el balance de gases de efecto invernadero de sistemas ganaderos extensivos en Uruguay: G. Becoña; Página 42. Selecao, manejo e produtividade do componente forrageiro em sistemas silvipastoris; Página 52. Integracao pastagem nativa-cultivos arbóreos; Página 63. Microclima en sistemas silvopastoriles: C. Munka; Página 69. Coeficientes técnicos para cuantificar el potencial de la integración forestación-ganadería, ¿Qué datos tenemos para presupuestar una ganadería entre los montes?: A. Simeone, V. Beretta, C.J. Caorsi; Página 81. Evaluación del impacto de la inclusión de la forestación en los sistemas ganaderos: J.I. Buffa, G. Canan, D. Varalla.
650 $aFORESTACIÓN
650 $aGANADERÍA
653 $aIMPACTO
700 1 $aCANAN, G.
700 1 $aVARALLA, D.
773 $tIntegración Ganadería Forestación, 2017, no. 1, p. 81-87.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
10/09/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
01/02/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
GARCÍA, L. F.; NÚÑEZ, E.; LACAVA, M.; SILVA, H.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; PÉTILLON, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
LUIS FERNANDO GARCÍA, Grupo multidisciplinario en Ecología para la Agricultura, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), UDELAR, Treinta y Tres; ERIKA NÚÑEZ, PDU - Estudios Interdisciplinarios de Sistemas Territoriales Complejos, CENUR Noreste, Universidad de la República, Rivera Uruguay. Programa para el Desarrollo en Ciencias Básicas (PEDECIBA, UDELAR, Montevideo, Uruguay.; MARIÁNGELES LACAVA, PDU Estudios Interdisciplinarios de Sistemas Territoriales Complejos, CENUR Noreste, UDELAR, Rivera, Uruguay.; HORACIO SILVA, Estación Experimental Mario A. Cassinoni, Facultad de Agronomía, UDELAR, Paysandú, Uruguay.; SEBASTIÁN MARTÍNEZ KOPP, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JULIEN PÉTILLON, UMR CNRS Université de Rennes, Rennes, France. |
|
Título : |
Experimental assessment of trophic ecology in a generalist spider predator: implications for biocontrol in uruguayan crops. [Original contribution]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Applied Entomology, February 2021, Volume145, Issue1-2, p.82-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12811 |
|
ISSN : |
0931-2048 |
|
DOI : |
doi.org/10.1111/jen.12811 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 22 April 2020; Revised: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; First published: 05 September 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
Conservative biological control promotes the use of native natural enemies to limit the size and growth of pest populations. Although spiders constitute one of the most important groups of native predators in several crops, their trophic ecology remains largely unknown, especially for several generalist taxa. In laboratory, we assessed the predatory behaviour of a wandering spider (the wolf spider Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling, 1877) against several arthropods varying in size and trophic positions, all found in South American soybean and rice crops. As prey we used the bug Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood, 1837) as well as larvae and adults of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797), both being considered important pests in Uruguayan crops. We also used several non‐pest arthropods as prey, sarcophagid flies, carabid beetles and wolf spiders. All prey were attacked in more or less high, although not statistically differing, proportions. However, carabids were not consumed, and bugs were consumed in significantly lower proportions than flies. A negative correlation was found between prey size and acceptance rate. Immobilization times were longer against larvae when compared to moths and flies, while predatory sequences were longer for bugs when compared to flies, moths and spiders. In addition, we found a positive effect of prey size on predatory sequence length and complexity. Our results confirm the ability of spiders to attack and feed upon prey with different morphologies, included well‐defended arthropods, and their potential use as natural enemies of several pests in South American crops. MenosConservative biological control promotes the use of native natural enemies to limit the size and growth of pest populations. Although spiders constitute one of the most important groups of native predators in several crops, their trophic ecology remains largely unknown, especially for several generalist taxa. In laboratory, we assessed the predatory behaviour of a wandering spider (the wolf spider Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling, 1877) against several arthropods varying in size and trophic positions, all found in South American soybean and rice crops. As prey we used the bug Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood, 1837) as well as larvae and adults of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797), both being considered important pests in Uruguayan crops. We also used several non‐pest arthropods as prey, sarcophagid flies, carabid beetles and wolf spiders. All prey were attacked in more or less high, although not statistically differing, proportions. However, carabids were not consumed, and bugs were consumed in significantly lower proportions than flies. A negative correlation was found between prey size and acceptance rate. Immobilization times were longer against larvae when compared to moths and flies, while predatory sequences were longer for bugs when compared to flies, moths and spiders. In addition, we found a positive effect of prey size on predatory sequence length and complexity. Our results confirm the ability of spiders to attack and feed upon prey with different morpho... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ARAÑA LOBO; BEHAVIOURAL SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; CONDITIONAL PREY ACCEPTANCE; RICE; SOYBEAN; WOLF SPIDER. |
|
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; CONTROL BIOLÓGICO; SOJA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02792naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1061305
005 2021-02-01
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0931-2048
024 7 $adoi.org/10.1111/jen.12811$2DOI
100 1 $aGARCÍA, L. F.
245 $aExperimental assessment of trophic ecology in a generalist spider predator$bimplications for biocontrol in uruguayan crops. [Original contribution].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received: 22 April 2020; Revised: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; First published: 05 September 2020.
520 $aConservative biological control promotes the use of native natural enemies to limit the size and growth of pest populations. Although spiders constitute one of the most important groups of native predators in several crops, their trophic ecology remains largely unknown, especially for several generalist taxa. In laboratory, we assessed the predatory behaviour of a wandering spider (the wolf spider Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling, 1877) against several arthropods varying in size and trophic positions, all found in South American soybean and rice crops. As prey we used the bug Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood, 1837) as well as larvae and adults of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797), both being considered important pests in Uruguayan crops. We also used several non‐pest arthropods as prey, sarcophagid flies, carabid beetles and wolf spiders. All prey were attacked in more or less high, although not statistically differing, proportions. However, carabids were not consumed, and bugs were consumed in significantly lower proportions than flies. A negative correlation was found between prey size and acceptance rate. Immobilization times were longer against larvae when compared to moths and flies, while predatory sequences were longer for bugs when compared to flies, moths and spiders. In addition, we found a positive effect of prey size on predatory sequence length and complexity. Our results confirm the ability of spiders to attack and feed upon prey with different morphologies, included well‐defended arthropods, and their potential use as natural enemies of several pests in South American crops.
650 $aARROZ
650 $aCONTROL BIOLÓGICO
650 $aSOJA
653 $aARAÑA LOBO
653 $aBEHAVIOURAL SEQUENCE
653 $aBIOLOGICAL CONTROL
653 $aCONDITIONAL PREY ACCEPTANCE
653 $aRICE
653 $aSOYBEAN
653 $aWOLF SPIDER
700 1 $aNÚÑEZ, E.
700 1 $aLACAVA, M.
700 1 $aSILVA, H.
700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ, S.
700 1 $aPÉTILLON, J.
773 $tJournal of Applied Entomology, February 2021, Volume145, Issue1-2, p.82-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12811
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
